Clay vs Apollo: Which B2B Data Tool Should You Actually Use?
My Verdict Upfront
If you're still figuring out who to target, start with Apollo. Once you know your ICP and want better qualification, switch to Clay. If you're doing serious volume, you'll probably end up using both.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | Clay | Apollo |
|---|---|---|
| Best For | Known ICP, quality over volume | Testing markets, high volume |
| Starting Price | $149/mo | $49/mo (or free) |
| Database Size | 50+ sources via waterfall | 200M+ contacts (proprietary) |
| Sequencing | None (pair with Reply.io/Instantly) | Basic (use Reply.io/Lemlist instead) |
| Key Strength | AI qualification + enrichment | Fast list building + testing |
| Learning Curve | Expert | Beginner |
| My Use Case | Refinement phase | Discovery + scale phase |
When Clay Makes Sense (And When It Doesn't)
✓ Use Clay When:
Your ICP is crystal clear.
You know exactly who you're targeting - specific titles, company sizes, tech stacks. Clay's AI qualification and waterfall enrichment shine here because you're not spray-and-pray anymore.
You need deep enrichment.
Clay pulls from 50+ data sources (ZoomInfo, Clearbit, People Data Labs, etc.) in a waterfall. If Apollo doesn't have the email, Clay will check 10 other places. Your hit rate goes from 60% to 85%+.
You want AI-powered qualification.
Clay lets you build qualification logic: "Only pull companies that raised Series A in the last 6 months AND use Salesforce AND are hiring SDRs." Apollo can filter, but Clay can think.
You're okay with complexity.
Clay is powerful but not simple. If you're technical or have 30 minutes to learn their table system, you'll love it. If you want plug-and-play, you won't.
✗ Skip Clay If:
- •You're still testing who to target. Burning $149/mo on enrichment credits when you don't know your ICP yet is wasteful. Use Apollo's cheaper database first.
- •You need multichannel sequences. Clay doesn't send emails. You'll need to pair it with Reply.io, Instantly, or Lemlist for email + LinkedIn + calls in one flow.
- •You're doing 10,000+ contacts/month at scale. Clay's credit system gets expensive fast. Apollo's flat pricing makes more sense for pure volume plays.
When Apollo Makes Sense (And When It Doesn't)
✓ Use Apollo When:
You're testing multiple markets.
Trying 5 different industries, 10 different titles, 3 different regions? Apollo's 200M+ database and granular filters let you test fast without burning enrichment credits.
You need a simple database to start.
Apollo has 200M+ contacts with solid filters. Don't use their sequencer though - it's limiting. Pair Apollo with Instantly, Reply.io, or Lemlist for actual sending.
You're doing high-volume outreach.
I'm talking thousands of contacts per month. Apollo's pricing structure ($49-$149/mo for unlimited contacts) makes this economical. Clay would cost you 3x-5x more.
You want fast time-to-value.
Apollo's learning curve is 30 minutes. Clay's is 3 hours. If you need to start sending today, Apollo wins.
✗ Skip Apollo If:
- •Your ICP requires deep qualification. Apollo's filters are good but not smart. You can't say "find companies mentioned in TechCrunch in Q4 2024" - that's Clay territory.
- •You need best-in-class data accuracy. Apollo's proprietary database is solid (200M+ contacts) but not as accurate as Clay's waterfall approach pulling from premium sources.
- •You want multichannel outreach. Apollo's sequencer is basic - email only, limited steps. If you're doing LinkedIn + email + calls, use Reply.io or Instantly instead.
The Hybrid Play (How Both Tools Work Together)
Apollo integrates directly with Clay. You can export lists from Apollo, push them into Clay for enrichment, then send via Reply.io or Instantly.
Bottom Line: Which One Should You Pick?
For Solo Founders Just Starting:
Go with Apollo. You need volume and speed more than perfect data. Get 1,000 prospects in your CRM this week, not 100 perfect ones next month.
Start with ApolloFor Founders with Consistent Growth:
Upgrade to Clay. You've proven your ICP, now it's about conversion rate. Clay's enrichment and AI qualification will 2x your reply rates.
Try Clay FreeFor Teams Doing Serious Volume (10+ SDRs):
Use both. Apollo for list building, Clay for enrichment on your best segments. Pair with Reply.io or Instantly for multichannel sequences (email + LinkedIn + calls).
For Agencies/Consultants:
Clay is your differentiator. Clients can buy Apollo themselves. They hire you for the qualification logic and enrichment strategies only Clay enables.
The Real Question Nobody Asks
"Should I learn Clay or Apollo first?"
Apollo.
Even if you end up on Clay long-term, understanding Apollo's database structure and filters teaches you how B2B data works. Clay is graduate school - don't skip undergrad.
Top Tier Stack
Apollo for discovery → Clay for enrichment → Reply.io for sending → HubSpot for tracking.
Need Help Setting This Up?
I help founders and sales teams build high-performing outbound systems with Clay, Apollo, and Reply.io.